🔗 Share this article

Loved ones whose relatives laid to rest in resting places vulnerable to coastal erosion state that indecision over how to address the issue is causing them unnecessary distress concerning the eternal homes of their loved ones.

An Impending Danger to Historic Churchyards

The council have singled out three burial grounds in the villages of Happisburgh, Mundesley, and Trimingham as being in danger of being swallowed by the sea in the coming decades.

A newly published study on the issue sets out a range of options, from taking no action to disinterring bodies and relocating them in more secure locations. Authorities say it is for the community to decide how to proceed.

“Right now we’re in limbo. It causes me distress. My parents wanted this to be their final resting place, but it won't be because of the sea.”

Projections indicate at least a portion of one graveyard could fall into the waves in the next 80 years, but some locals fear it will happen much sooner. “In my view it’s got less than 20 years, if you look at what’s occurred in the last 30 years,” a farmer stated.

Haunted by the Ghosts of Eccles

One resident remembered a childhood visit to the neighbouring settlement of Eccles, which has largely vanished into the water, including its place of worship and burial ground.

“You could see human remains,” she said. “Some have this idealized notion that the deceased will just get carried away to sea. That is not the case. Individuals will collect remains as mementos and go plundering graves in search of valuables. It’s completely undignified.”

“I’m worried that the same thing that happened at Eccles will occur at Happisburgh and there’ll be skeletons on the shore. I’d be disgusted by that.”

A Soldier's Resting Place in Peril

Further up the coast is situated the grave of a former paratrooper who died while working abroad. His mother expressed she could not sleep after learning her son’s grave might one day be moved.

“It does disturb me to think this may not remain his permanent home,” she said. “For us it’s an important place to go.”

She believes, new burials should cease but says it is too soon to exhume current plots. “My preference for now is to do nothing and watch carefully, but an timely resolution needs to be made when a critical moment has been attained.”

Seeking Answers and Certainty

The lack of agreement over when and how to tackle the problem has left grieving relatives feeling frustrated and worried.

Some are calling for more coastal protections to slow the unavoidable loss and to allow funerals to proceed for now. Others contend the time for relocation is drawing near.

“It is very emotional,” said one relative. “The council’s report was thorough, but now there’s uncertainty about how it is implemented. And everybody is washing their hands over who is responsible.”

A local official said the graveyards were under the care of the church authorities. “In the end it is up to them to choose the path to take. Our role is here to help support them through that journey with communities.”

It was also stated there was time to consider all the choices. “We are talking many years before it starts to be lost.”

“There is no unified opinion on what should happen yet. It requires productive local conversations to discover the appropriate answers for each community.”

The prospect of losing the historic sites was described as one of “profound sadness for the local community,” but faith leaders also spoke of a doctrine in resurrection, offering a spiritual viewpoint on the temporal disappearance of hallowed earth.